Call Us:
480.345.2652
FREE Initial Consultation

Archives

  • June 2017 (4)
  • April 2017 (5)
  • March 2017 (5)
  • February 2017 (5)
  • January 2017 (5)
  • December 2016 (5)
  • November 2016 (5)
  • October 2016 (5)
  • September 2016 (5)
  • August 2016 (5)
  • July 2016 (5)
  • June 2016 (5)
  • May 2016 (7)
  • April 2016 (5)
  • March 2016 (5)
  • February 2016 (5)
  • January 2016 (6)
  • December 2015 (5)
  • November 2015 (5)
  • October 2015 (8)
  • September 2015 (3)
  • August 2015 (9)
  • July 2015 (5)
  • June 2015 (5)
  • May 2015 (5)
  • March 2015 (5)
  • February 2015 (5)
  • January 2015 (5)
  • December 2014 (5)
  • November 2014 (5)
  • October 2014 (5)
  • September 2014 (9)
  • July 2014 (5)
  • June 2014 (5)
  • May 2014 (3)
  • January 2014 (1)

  • Areas of Focus

    Contact Us Today

    Law Office of Ronald Kossack
    4645 South Lakeshore Drive, Suite 4
    Tempe, AZ 85282

    Phone: 480-345-2652
    Fax: 480-897-6038
    Email: info@kossacklaw.com

    Difference between Mediation & Arbitration

    Are you wondering about the difference between mediation & arbitration? There are pros and cons to each of these methods depending on your situation and while they are similar, they have some distinct differences.

    The primary difference between mediation and arbitration is simple: Arbitrators hand down decisions similar to judges. When two parties agree to arbitration they are agreeing to abide by the ruling without many options for appeal.

    Mediation

    Mediation can be voluntary or compulsory (court ordered). Often with child custody arrangements, the courts will order the divorcing or separating couple to attend mediation and try to work out the details between themselves before the judge will make a ruling. The judge will stay, or pause, proceedings until an outcome is reached. Often there is only a single mediator, who does not need formal legal training, that will facilitate negotiations between parties. If either a settlement is reached or there is a deadlock in the negotiations the mediator will make a recommendation to the court where the judge will hand down a ruling. This gives the mediator an important role and gives parties an incentive to make a good faith effort to arrive at a mutually beneficial agreement.

    Arbitration

    Arbitration may also be voluntary or compulsory but is a replacement for a trial. Since there will not be a trial, the ruling of the arbitrator is binding just as a judge’s order would be. The arbitration may be handled by either a single arbitrator or a panel of arbitrators who, like mediators, do not need any formal legal training. Since the decision of the arbitrator(s) is final, their role is crucial and choosing them carefully is very important.

    There are different situations where one method may benefit parties better than another method. Some examples for each are:

    Circumstances best for Mediation

    • Divorce and child custody
    • Harassment in the workplace
    • Disputes between family members, neighbors, landlords, or business partners

    Circumstances best for Arbitration

    • When there are jurisdictional issues
    • When both parties require confidentiality
    • When a specialist is needed to make a ruling
    • When time and money is a concern

    Call Tempe Attorney, Ronald L. Kossack

    There are pros and cons to consider with any important legal decision. Call the Law Office of Ronald L. Kossack to discuss whether mediation or arbitration is best for your situation. Contact our office or call 480-345-2652.